-The Gay & Lesbian Review
JONATHAN D. KATZ is a pioneering curator and historian of queer æsthetics and scholarship. Currently a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, he has taught at Yale University, Smith College, and City College of San Francisco, among others. He was the founding president of New York’s Leslie-Lohman Museum of Gay and Lesbian Art.
Katz has mounted queer-themed exhibitions in Europe, South America, and the U.S. In 2010, his groundbreaking exhibition Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture opened at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Portrait Gallery in Washington DC, featuring paintings, drawings, photography, installations, and media images of lesbian and gay identities in the 20th century. It was a first for a national American museum.
Last July, I reviewed in these pages Katz’ catalogue for About Face: Stonewall, Revolt, and New Queer Art, an exhibition at Chicago’s Wrightwood 659 featuring over 350 artworks by 38 international LGBT artists. Katz has a long history with Wrightwood, a contemporary museum designed by Pritzker Prize-winning architect Tadao Ando. His latest collaboration with Wrightwood, his most ambitious to date, is a show titled The First Homosexuals: The Birth of a New Identity, 1869–1939. It was in 1869 that the term “homosexual” was first coined. The exhibition examines how this new concept impacted societal perceptions and artistic representations in the ensuing decades. It also explores the lives of these artists whose works have been overlooked or “straightwashed” by art critics and curators to date.
I spoke with Katz via Zoom about his latest exhibition and past projects.
John R. Killacky: The scope of your exhibition is exhilarating: 300 works by over 125 LGBT artists from forty countries on loan from over a hundred museums and collections. How long did you work on this, and how did you ever convince so many institutions to loan work?
Jonathan D. Katz: Almost seven years. In many respects, this is only the tip of the iceberg. When putting together the exhibition we had three or four checklists. If we got rejected for a loan, we went down the list and got another work. Sometimes we got our first choices, sometimes we got our fourth or fifth choices. Eventually we were able to have a good indicator of what the early homosexual looked like. We have some holes. We ran into a lot of problems with India, former Soviet states, and of course with Russia itself.
The exhibition came out of a desire to do something that hadn’t been done before. I want to mention my assistant curator, Johnny Willis. They are nonbinary and have been absolutely essential in managing the exhibition and also in helping to frame the dynamic of the relationship between queer and trans identities.
JRK: Will the exhibition tour?
JDK: We are in current negotiations with two institutions in Europe. It is telling that no other institution in the U.S. is doing it. I want to underscore that sponsorship for the exhibition extended to these other museums; they would have had it for free. Lest we think we are beyond the politics here, we’re not.
JRK: The catalogue essays are revelatory and erudite: 22 scholars contextualizing works from Europe, Africa, Australia, Asia, and the Americas. The articles are a primer in international queer and gender studies. How did you put this team together?
JDK: I started researching who were the best people in different areas, and I think we got most of them. One of the things that was absolutely critical was making sure we had people who were really developed scholars in each of these geographic areas, and they needed to write in English.
JRK: In the catalogue, I particularly loved the last section of the exhibition, Beyond the Binary. Can you talk about this?
JDK: We felt it was really important at the moment that we were reinforcing the idea of homosexuality to underscore that it was never only about same-sex desire. We wanted to make clear that in many respects, trans and queer have always been with us. You can’t talk about same-sex desire without interrogating what sex you are talking about.
JRK: In 2022, you curated an earlier iteration of The First Homosexuals at Wrightwood 659 featuring 125 works by forty artists. Why did you decide to expand the exhibition?
JDK: What happened was Covid. Many museums all over the world went into loan moratorium, not only in the peak Covid period, but for another year. So, we literally couldn’t do the exhibition that we had planned. We had already had some loan letters go out, so we thought, what the hell, now we have an opportunity to test-market the theme.
JRK: In your work in museums and academia, you challenge the prevailing tendency to erase queerness as part of an artist’s identity, particularly those from the 19th and 20th centuries. Your work makes this case persuasively, yet museums still resist. Why is that?
JDK: I think it goes all the way back to the 1980s and the Robert Mapplethorpe exhibition The Perfect Moment, when the combination of queerness and museums proved to be a third rail. In the museum world, innovation is in short supply, and yet they are very worried about what will be perceived as political. What they fail to see is that by not addressing questions of gender and sexuality, they are being equally political. And they are not wrong; ours will be perceived as a political exhibition.
Our enemies use this in their fundraising. But this does not excuse the cowardice of institutions. And let’s be clear that in this country, private money controls most public museums. And that money skews right. I am a longtime stalwart in this field and can tell you it hasn’t changed very much in the thirty years that I have been doing this.
JRK: In 2010, the director of the Smithsonian pulled a David Wojnarowicz video, A Fire in My Belly, from your exhibition Hide/Seek. What happened?
JDK: This was a kind of classic bureaucratic stupidity. The director of the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery and the curatorial team had worked out every kind of possibility of what would happen and had an ascending series of moves that we had calculated in advance. We had all these plans. Then the head of the Smithsonian panicked because they threatened to cut the budget by $60 million or something like that. He summarily ignored our plans and snatched defeat for the institution out of the jaws of victory.
JRK: For those who don’t know, the video shows a crucifix on the ground with ants crawling over it to the music of Diamanda Galás.
JDK: The funny thing about that image, I wasn’t really sure I wanted to use it because it was so damn Catholic. It was the most religious work in the entire exhibition.
JRK: You’ve been doing a lot of lecturing in France and Germany. Why is that?
JDK: Germany is a fertile ground for us. There are lots of conferences on sexuality. I am working on several exhibitions that will be happening in a couple of years there.
In France we contributed to an exhibition on the work of Gustave Caillebotte, an early French Impressionist who was the subject of a one-person show at the Musée d’Orsay called Gustave Caillebotte: Painting Men. Seventy percent of the work features male subjects, and many of the subjects are nude or partially so.
My husband André Dombrowski and I wrote a chapter in the exhibition catalog about it that got picked up in French newspapers as an example of the colonization of the French Academy by American identity politics. In response, the d’Orsay did something wonderful and hosted a symposium to bring out all the scholarship. Unfortunately, none of the people who attacked us came to the symposium.
JRK: What other shows are you working on?
JDK: There will be an exhibition also at Wrightwood in the spring of 2026, Dispossession in the Americas, featuring contemporary Latin American work including a lot of work by queer and trans artists.
JRK: I know you are planning a book on Jasper Johns…
JDK: I have three books in advance of that. The books before are the catalogue for the current exhibition and then books on two queer artists: photographer Arthur Tress and land artist Jim McGee, not to mention the catalog for the Dispossession in the Americasexhibition.
JRK: Getting back to Jasper Johns, he and all his contemporaries were never out. They were not necessarily closeted, but the press remained completely silent about their queerness.
JDK: I always loved his work. I think he’s one of the greatest artists of our time. I am also looking to underscore the degree to which many of the most celebrated American paintings by Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg, and Cy Twombly not only have queerness at their center but also are coy missives sent back and forth to each other referencing each other’s painting, each other’s personalities. Essentially there is a gay love story at the very epicenter of postwar American art.
One of the things that makes this particularly charged is that the generation that proceeded these artists were the Abstract Expressionists, who were completely heterosexual. This next generation of Johns, Rauschenberg, Twombly, Cage, Cunningham, and Warhol were queer. So, obviously sexuality had something to do with it.